Skip to main content
Number №2, 2026
Hallucinations of large language models in clinical urology
Number №1, 2026

Features of the management tactics for patients with varicocele in various regions of the Russian Federation according to the results of a survey of specialists

Number №4, 2025
Modern trends in the treatment of hypospadias in the Russian Federation Metabolic conditions for the formation of calcium oxalate urinary stones A comprehensive approach to the treatment of chronic encrusting cystitis Voiding diary: clinical significance and prospects for digitalization
Number №3, 2025
First analysis of laboratory adherence in the Russian Federation to the sixth edition of the WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen
Number №2, 2025
Post-Void Residual Urine Ratio (PVR-R) as a prognostic marker of chronic kidney disease in men with benign prostate hyperplasia
Number №1, 2025
The effect of testosterone replacement therapy on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men
Number №4, 2024
The structure of damage of the genitourinary system in modern armed conflict
Number №3, 2024
Cost-effectiveness of urinary incontinence treatment in a short-stay hospital
Number №2, 2024
Complex medicines for correction of urine pH level during urolithiasis metaphylaxis
Number №1, 2024
Moscow program on histofusion biopsy of the prostate: results of a survey of practicing urologists based on data from a multicenter study
Number №4, 2023
Possibilities for improving the therapeutic activity of bacteriophage preparations Urological complications after renal transplantation
Number №3, 2023
Regulatory and legal possibilities for metaphylaxis of urolithiasis in the Russian Federation
Number №2, 2023
Frequency and nature of symptoms of dysfunction of the lower urinary tract in persons over 40 years old Postcoital cystitis as a cause of sexual dysfunction in women
Number №4, 2022
Surgical treatment of inferior vena cava tumor thrombus X-ray-free ureterolithotripsy for ureteral stones
Number №3, 2022
Brachytherapy for prostate cancer and immune response Risk factors for nephrolithiasis after radical cystectomy with intestinal plasty of the bladder
Number №2, 2022
The incidence of urolithiasis in the Russian Federation from 2005 to 2020 Urolithiasis and the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke
Number №1, 2022
A modern view on the screening of urolithiasis Hereditary factor of metaphylaxis of urolithiasis Treatment of infertility associated with a high level of sperm DNA fragmentation
Number №4, 2021
COVID-19 associated encrusting cystitis Endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux in children: differentiated choice of method, material and dosage
Number №3, 2021
Artificial intelligence in urology oncology Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy without ureteral catheterization. Comparison with the standard method
Number №1, 2021
Epidemiological study of the prevalence of cystitis in women in the Voronezh region Congenital anomalies of the penis: world and domestic data
Number №5, 2020
Isolated kidney injury: international guidelines and Moscow standards
Number №3, 2020
Epidemiology of neurogenic urinary disorders. Treatment outcomes for high-risk prostate cancer patients: a multicenter analysis
Number №2, 2020
COVID-19: Impact on the Urological Service of the Russian Federation Genitourinary system and Covid-19: some aspects
Number №1, 2020
Distance education in urology. Experience 2012-2019 Inpatient care for urological patients in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic
Number №4, 2019
Male infertility in the Russian Federation: statistics for 2000-2018 Evaluation of the effectiveness of perineum muscle training in restoring erectile function
Number №3, 2019
Epidemiology of urolithiasis in the Perm region: results of a 30-year study The economic and economic rationale for the use of modern methods of treating urolithiasis
Номер №4, 2018
Incidence of ICD in the Russian Federation (2005-2016) Screening for prostate cancer: modern presentation and organization Primary multiple transitional cell epithelium Androgenic screening in men over 50 years
Номер №3, 2018
The role of stem cells in the treatment of urinary incontinence Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in infected urine Testicular Prosthesis in Children and Adolescents: Results from a Multicenter Study Premature ejaculation is the current state of the problem.
Number №2, 2018
Alternative methods of treatment of localized prostate cancer Partial doubling of the urethra: paraurethral motion Comparative review of disposable flexible ureteronephroscope
Number №1, 2018
The prevalence of symptoms of impairment of the function of the lower urinary tract in men according to the results of a population study Patient-centered system of organization of medical care in urology using...
Number №4, 2017
Predicting the development of erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular diseases Prognostic factors of survival of patients with prostate cancer
Number №3, 2017
Recommendations for the treatment of prostate cancer with the help of high-power interstitial radiation therapy (brachytherapy)
Number №2, 2017

Radioisotope lymphoscintigraphy with PCa
Metabolic risk factors and formation of urinary stones
Ureteral amputation in the performance of contact ureterolithotrypsy

Number №1, 2017
Principles of «4P Medicine» in the organization of health care in the context of urological diseases Changes in the electrolyte composition of urine under the influence of sodium hypochlorite. The possibility of reducing the risk of recurrence of nephrolithiasis
Number №4, 2016
Preliminary results of a multicenter study of prostate cancer Analysis of specialized medical care for patients with gross hematuria, renal colic.
Number №3, 2016
Techniques for preserving continence after robot-prostatectomy The protective partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma
Number №2, 2016
Медицинская помощь пациентам с острой задержкой мочеиспускания Прогностическое значение истинного кастрационного уровня тестостерона..
Number №1, 2016
The analysis of the accuracy of factors for the survival predictiry after radical cystectomy Citokine status in pathients with recurrent urinary tract infection
Number №4, 2015

Modern demographic situation in Russia Determination of gene mutations FGFR3 and PIK3CA DNA urine sediment from patients with bladder cancerя

Number №3, 2015
Neuroendocrine differentiation in cancer prostate. The role of viruses in carcinogenesis of bladder cancer.
Number №2, 2015
Clinical and economic evaluation of prostate cancer screening The combination RSAZ TMPRSS2-ERG in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: first experience
Number №1, 2015
The role of distance education in improving primary health care professionals. Comparative analysis of the results of cancer radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy.
Number №4, 2014
Experience of clinical and economical treatment cancer patients Comparison of analysis details for open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted nephrectomy in the..
Number №3, 2014
Medical and economic aspects of a comprehensive standardized program-stage diagnosis and treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
Number №2, 2014
Uronephrological morbidity and mortality in Russia in 2002-2012 Androgens and chronic ischemia PCA3 test-system: first results
Number №1, 2014
First results of standardized programme for BPH diagnosis and treatment Evaluation of serum Chromogranin A levels in different prostatic diseases Retarded ejaculation is a rare diagnosis
Number №4, 2013
Distance education in urology brachytherapy prostate cancer Erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular ...
Number №3, 2013
The incidence of kidney stones... HIFU-treatment of local recurrence of cancer... Non-prostatic sources of prostate...
Number №2, 2013
Risk factors for the development
of the urolithiasis in patients
with the metabolic syndrome
Number №1, 2013
Clinical and economic analysis of the surgical treatment of prostate cancer Brachytherapy prostate cancer: postimplantnaya dosimetry and dependence ... Simulation prostatic carcinogenesis
Number №4, 2012
Урологическая заболеваемость в Нижегородской области Стресс, метаболический синдром и хроническая болезнь почек TVT - 10 лет в России
Eksperimental'naya i klinicheskaya urologiya

Choosing a method for contact stone fragmentation during percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children

Number №2, 2026 - page 190-197
DOI: 10.29188/2222-8543-2026-19-2-190-197
For citation: Vardak A.B., Merinov D.S., Arustamov L.D., Rudin Y.E., Aliev D.K., Lagutin G.V., Polyakov N.V., Natkina V.N., González Duranóna K.E., Apolikhin O.I., Kaprin A.D. Choosing a method for contact stone fragmentation during percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children. Experimental and Clinical Urology. 2026;19(2):190-197; https://doi.org/10.29188/2222-8543-2026-19-2-190-197
Vardak A.B., Merinov D.S., Arustamov L.D., Rudin Y.E., Aliev D.K., Lagutin G.V., Polyakov N.V., Natkina V.N., González Duranóna K.E., Apolikhin O.I., Kaprin A.D.
Information about authors:

Vardak A.B. – PhD, doctor of children's uroandrology department of N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – Branch of the National Medical Research Centre of Radiology of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia; RSCI Author ID: 695565, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0722-4237

Merinov D.S. – Dr. Sci., Head of the Endourology group Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre of Ministry of health of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

Arustamov L.D. – PhD, researcher of the department of X-ray shock wave remote crushing of stones Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre of Ministry of health of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia; RSCI Author ID: 695359, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0722-4237

Rudin Yu. E. – Dr. Sci., Professor, Head of the Department of Pediatric Urology of N. Lopatkin Re¬search Institute of urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Centre of Radiology of Ministry of health of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia; RSCI Author ID: 423343, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5973-615X

Aliev D.K. – PhD, doctor of children's uroandrology Department of N. Lopatkin Research Institute of urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Centre of Radiology of Ministry of health of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia; RSCI Author ID: 1003160, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9813-3447

Lagutin G.V. – PhD, doctor of children's uroandrology Department of N. Lopatkin Research Institute of urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Centre of Radiology of Ministry of health of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia; RSCI Author ID: 1003158, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3162-5997

Polyakov N.V. – PhD, Head of the Reconstructive Urology Group, Department of General and Reconstructive Urology of N. Lopatkin Research Institute of urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Centre of Radiology of Ministry of health of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia; RSCI Author ID: 412267, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5089-1110

Natkina V.N. – resident, Pediatric Urology Group N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia; https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7801-1397

González Duranóna Kristina Emiliovna – student, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1817-070X 

Apolikhin O.I. – Dr. Sci., Professor, corresponding member of RAS, director of N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Centre of Radiology of Ministry of health of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia;
RSCI Author ID: 683661, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0206-043X

Kaprin A.D. – Dr. Sci., Professor, academician of RAS, general director of the National Medical Research Centre of Radiology of Ministry of health of Russian Federation; director of Moscow Scientific Research Oncological Institute named after P.A. Herzen; Head of Department of Oncology and Radiology named after V.P. Kharchenko of Peoples' Friendship University of Russia; Chief Freelance Oncologist at the Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow, Russia; RSCI Author ID: 96775, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8784-8415

29
Download PDF

Introduction. Contact lithotripsy is a modern minimally invasive procedure. It is used to treat kidney stones in pediatric urology using laser, pneumatic and ultrasonic methods.

The aim of the study is increasing the effectiveness of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in children using various types of contact lithotripters.

Material and methods. Between 2008 and 2024, 502 patients (aged 1–17 y/o) underwent percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PNL) at the Department of Pediatric Urology of N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre. Patients were divided into three groups depending on the size of the used instruments and the contact lithotripsy method. The first group (n=322) underwent surgery using the 15–16Ch mini PNL technique. The second group (n=20) underwent surgery using the ultra-mini PNL technique and the third group (n=17) underwent surgery using the standard PNL technique with 24Ch nephroscope (n=160). The procedure was performed using standard methods; all children underwent cystoscopy, ureteral catheterization, percautaneous access, lithotripsy, lapaxy, and nephrostomy drainage.

Results. Complete elimination of clinically significant size stones was achieved after the primary procedure in 258 (80.2%) patients of the first study group, in 18 (90%) patients in the second group and in 126 (78.7%) patients went stone free. Laser lithotripter was used in 44.5% (143 patients) in the mini PNL group, pneumatic lithotripsy was performed in 50.9% (164 patients) and ultrasonic one – in 4.6% (15 children). In the ultra-mini PNL group laser lithotripter was used in 100% of cases. In the third group with a standard-size nephroscope, laser lithotripter was used in 20% (32 children), pneumatic lithotripsy in 23.1% (37 children), and ultrasonic lithotriptsy in 56.9% (91 children).

Conclusion. The choice of contact lithotripter is limited by the size of the instrument used, the density and chemical composition of stones. Only a laser contact lithotripter can be used in ultra-mini PNL due to the small size of the working channel of the instrument (12 Ch nephroscope sheath). The use of an ultrasonic lithotripter through the working channel of a mini-nephroscope is difficult due to frequent obstruction of the of the lithotripter sonotrode aspiration channel by small fragments of the stones at the litholapaxy stage. Dense stones, 1200 HU and higher, should be destroyed using pneumatic and laser contact lithotripsy. It is advisable to destroy cystine and xanthine stones using a pneu¬matic lithotripter because of their soft waxy structure.

Attachment Size
Download 671.57 KB
Keywords: urolithiasis; percutaneous nephrolithotomy; PNL; children; pneumatic PNL; laser PNL; ultrasonic PNL