18+

 

Number №3, 2025 - page 80-87

Outpatient urine culture before endourological interventions for urolithiasis: does it make sense to repeat it in a hospital? DOI: 10.29188/2222-8543-2025-18-3-80-87

For citation: Petrov A.D., Aloyan A.A., Gorgotsky I.A., Semeniakin I.V., Shkarupa A.A., Gadzhiev N.K. Outpatient urine culture before en- dourological interventions for urolithiasis: does it make sense to repeat it in a hospital? Experimental and Clinical Urology 2025;18(3):80-87; https://doi.org/10.29188/2222-8543-2025-18-3-80-87
Petrov A.D., Aloyan A.A., Gorgotsky I.A., Semeniakin I.V., Shkarupa A.A., Gadzhiev N.K.
Information about authors:
  • Petrov A.D. – Urologist, N.I. Pirogov Clinic of High Medical Technologies, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia; RSCI Author ID 1264058, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5804-2033
  • Aloyan A.A. – Urologist, N.I. Pirogov Clinic of High Medical Technologies, Saint-Petersburg State University; Saint-Petersburg, Russia; RSCI Author ID 1175552; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6273-4224
  • Gorgotsky I.A. – PhD, Urologist, N.I. Pirogov Clinic of High Medical Technologies, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia; RSCI Author ID 1141685; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8514-5510
  • Semeniakin I.V. – Dr. Sci., Dept. of Urology, Russian University of Medicine of Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia; RSCI Author ID 931018 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3246-7337
  • Shkarupa A.A. – student of S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy; Saint Petersburg, Russia, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
  • Gadzhiev N.K. – Dr. Sci., Deputy Director for Medical Affairs (Urology), Urologist, N.I. Pirogov Clinic of High Medical Technologies, Saint-Petersburg State University; Saint-Petersburg, Russia; RSCI Author ID 819314; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6255-019
116

Introduction. Preoperative prevention of urinary tract infections is crucial for reducing complications in endourological interventions for urolithiasis. Our study evaluates the diagnostic comparability of outpatient and inpatient urine analyses and their impact on antibacterial strategy.

Materials and methods. We analyzed data from 100 patients who underwent endourological surgeries for urolithiasis between November 2022 and June 2023. Outpatient urine cultures, performed within two weeks prior to hospitalization, were compared with inpatient urine cultures conducted preoperatively. Pathogens were identified using standard protocols, and discrepancies were assessed for their influence on antibacterial therapy.

Results. Among 100 patients, a complete correspondence between outpatient and inpatient urine cultures was recorded only in 41 cases (41%): in 23 cases (23%), microflora growth was not detected, and in 18 cases (18%), the same pathogen was detected. Gram-negative bacteria, in particular Escherichia coli, were the most frequently detected pathogens. Inpatient crops revealed unique genera of infectious agents, including Klebsiella spp. and Candida spp., which highlights the diagnostic limitations of outpatient studies.

Conclusion. Significant discrepancies between outpatient and inpatient urine analyses underscore the need for a two-stage urine culture control protocol to enhance diagnostic accuracy and optimize preoperative antibacterial preparation. Inpatient cultures provide critical data for therapy adjustment. Further prospective studies comparing outpatient and inpatient urine culture results are warranted.

AttachmentSize
Download639.15 KB
urinary tract infections; urolithiasis; urine culture

Readera - Социальная платформа публикаций

Crossref makes research outputs easy to find, cite, link, and assess