Skip to main content
Number №3, 2025
First analysis of laboratory adherence in the Russian Federation to the sixth edition of the WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen
Number №2, 2025
Post-Void Residual Urine Ratio (PVR-R) as a prognostic marker of chronic kidney disease in men with benign prostate hyperplasia
Number №1, 2025
The effect of testosterone replacement therapy on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men
Number №4, 2024
The structure of damage of the genitourinary system in modern armed conflict
Number №3, 2024
Cost-effectiveness of urinary incontinence treatment in a short-stay hospital
Number №2, 2024
Complex medicines for correction of urine pH level during urolithiasis metaphylaxis
Number №1, 2024
Moscow program on histofusion biopsy of the prostate: results of a survey of practicing urologists based on data from a multicenter study
Number №4, 2023
Possibilities for improving the therapeutic activity of bacteriophage preparations Urological complications after renal transplantation
Number №3, 2023
Regulatory and legal possibilities for metaphylaxis of urolithiasis in the Russian Federation
Number №2, 2023
Frequency and nature of symptoms of dysfunction of the lower urinary tract in persons over 40 years old Postcoital cystitis as a cause of sexual dysfunction in women
Number №4, 2022
Surgical treatment of inferior vena cava tumor thrombus X-ray-free ureterolithotripsy for ureteral stones
Number №3, 2022
Brachytherapy for prostate cancer and immune response Risk factors for nephrolithiasis after radical cystectomy with intestinal plasty of the bladder
Number №2, 2022
The incidence of urolithiasis in the Russian Federation from 2005 to 2020 Urolithiasis and the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke
Number №1, 2022
A modern view on the screening of urolithiasis Hereditary factor of metaphylaxis of urolithiasis Treatment of infertility associated with a high level of sperm DNA fragmentation
Number №4, 2021
COVID-19 associated encrusting cystitis Endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux in children: differentiated choice of method, material and dosage
Number №3, 2021
Artificial intelligence in urology oncology Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy without ureteral catheterization. Comparison with the standard method
Number №1, 2021
Epidemiological study of the prevalence of cystitis in women in the Voronezh region Congenital anomalies of the penis: world and domestic data
Number №5, 2020
Isolated kidney injury: international guidelines and Moscow standards
Number №3, 2020
Epidemiology of neurogenic urinary disorders. Treatment outcomes for high-risk prostate cancer patients: a multicenter analysis
Number №2, 2020
COVID-19: Impact on the Urological Service of the Russian Federation Genitourinary system and Covid-19: some aspects
Number №1, 2020
Distance education in urology. Experience 2012-2019 Inpatient care for urological patients in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic
Number №4, 2019
Male infertility in the Russian Federation: statistics for 2000-2018 Evaluation of the effectiveness of perineum muscle training in restoring erectile function
Number №3, 2019
Epidemiology of urolithiasis in the Perm region: results of a 30-year study The economic and economic rationale for the use of modern methods of treating urolithiasis
Номер №4, 2018
Incidence of ICD in the Russian Federation (2005-2016) Screening for prostate cancer: modern presentation and organization Primary multiple transitional cell epithelium Androgenic screening in men over 50 years
Номер №3, 2018
The role of stem cells in the treatment of urinary incontinence Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in infected urine Testicular Prosthesis in Children and Adolescents: Results from a Multicenter Study Premature ejaculation is the current state of the problem.
Number №2, 2018
Alternative methods of treatment of localized prostate cancer Partial doubling of the urethra: paraurethral motion Comparative review of disposable flexible ureteronephroscope
Number №1, 2018
The prevalence of symptoms of impairment of the function of the lower urinary tract in men according to the results of a population study Patient-centered system of organization of medical care in urology using...
Number №4, 2017
Predicting the development of erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular diseases Prognostic factors of survival of patients with prostate cancer
Number №3, 2017
Recommendations for the treatment of prostate cancer with the help of high-power interstitial radiation therapy (brachytherapy)
Number №2, 2017

Radioisotope lymphoscintigraphy with PCa
Metabolic risk factors and formation of urinary stones
Ureteral amputation in the performance of contact ureterolithotrypsy

Number №1, 2017
Principles of «4P Medicine» in the organization of health care in the context of urological diseases Changes in the electrolyte composition of urine under the influence of sodium hypochlorite. The possibility of reducing the risk of recurrence of nephrolithiasis
Number №4, 2016
Preliminary results of a multicenter study of prostate cancer Analysis of specialized medical care for patients with gross hematuria, renal colic.
Number №3, 2016
Techniques for preserving continence after robot-prostatectomy The protective partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma
Number №2, 2016
Медицинская помощь пациентам с острой задержкой мочеиспускания Прогностическое значение истинного кастрационного уровня тестостерона..
Number №1, 2016
The analysis of the accuracy of factors for the survival predictiry after radical cystectomy Citokine status in pathients with recurrent urinary tract infection
Number №4, 2015

Modern demographic situation in Russia Determination of gene mutations FGFR3 and PIK3CA DNA urine sediment from patients with bladder cancerя

Number №3, 2015
Neuroendocrine differentiation in cancer prostate. The role of viruses in carcinogenesis of bladder cancer.
Number №2, 2015
Clinical and economic evaluation of prostate cancer screening The combination RSAZ TMPRSS2-ERG in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: first experience
Number №1, 2015
The role of distance education in improving primary health care professionals. Comparative analysis of the results of cancer radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy.
Number №4, 2014
Experience of clinical and economical treatment cancer patients Comparison of analysis details for open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted nephrectomy in the..
Number №3, 2014
Medical and economic aspects of a comprehensive standardized program-stage diagnosis and treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
Number №2, 2014
Uronephrological morbidity and mortality in Russia in 2002-2012 Androgens and chronic ischemia PCA3 test-system: first results
Number №1, 2014
First results of standardized programme for BPH diagnosis and treatment Evaluation of serum Chromogranin A levels in different prostatic diseases Retarded ejaculation is a rare diagnosis
Number №4, 2013
Distance education in urology brachytherapy prostate cancer Erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular ...
Number №3, 2013
The incidence of kidney stones... HIFU-treatment of local recurrence of cancer... Non-prostatic sources of prostate...
Number №2, 2013
Risk factors for the development
of the urolithiasis in patients
with the metabolic syndrome
Number №1, 2013
Clinical and economic analysis of the surgical treatment of prostate cancer Brachytherapy prostate cancer: postimplantnaya dosimetry and dependence ... Simulation prostatic carcinogenesis
Number №4, 2012
Урологическая заболеваемость в Нижегородской области Стресс, метаболический синдром и хроническая болезнь почек TVT - 10 лет в России
Eksperimental'naya i klinicheskaya urologiya

Metabolic risk factors and urinary stones formation. VIII: Lithogenic features of urinary pH in men and women

Number №4, 2023 - page 102-111
DOI: 10.29188/2222-8543-2023-16-4-102-111
For citation: Golovanov S.A., Prosyannikov M.Yu., Sivkov A.V., Anokhin N.V., Voytko D.A., Drozhzheva V.V. Metabolic risk factors and urinary stone formation. Study VIII: Lithogenic properties of urine acidity in men and women. Experimental and Clinical Urology 2023;16(4):102-111; https://doi.org/10.29188/2222-8543-2023-16-4-102-111
Golovanov S.A. Prosyannikov M.Yu. Sivkov A.V. Anohin N.V. Voytko D.A. Drozhzheva V.V.
Information about authors:
  • Golovanov S.A. – Dr. Sci., head of clinical laboratory diagnostic group of scientific laboratory department, N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – Branch of the National Medical Research Centre of Radiology of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation; Moscow, Russia; RSCI Author ID 636685, https://orcid.org/0000‑0002‑6516‑4730
  • Prosyannikov M.Yu. – Dr. Sci., head of the department of N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Centre of Radiology of Ministry of health of Russian Federation; Moscow, Russia; RSCI Author ID 791050, https://orcid.org/0000‑0003‑3635‑5244
  • Sivkov A.V. – PhD, Deputy Director of N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – Branch of the National Medical Research Centre of Radiology of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation; Moscow, Russia; RSCI Author ID 622663, https://orcid.org/0000‑0001‑8852‑6485
  • Anokhin N.V. – PhD., Senior Researcher at the Department of urolithiasis of N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre; Moscow, Russia; RSCI Author ID 8807749, https://orcid.org/0000‑0002‑4341‑4276
  • Voytko D.A. – PhD, Senior Researcher of N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Centre of Radiology of Ministry of health of Russian Federation; Moscow, Russia; RSCI Author ID 942353, https://orcid.org/0000‑0003‑1292‑1651
  • Drozhzheva V.V. – researcher of scientific Laboratory Department of N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – Branch of the National Medical Research Centre of Radiology of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation; Moscow, Russia; RSCI Author ID 696724
3781
Download PDF

Introduction. Urine acidity is an important factor that can actively modulate the process of stone formation in the kidneys, which allows using this indicator to use this indicator to assess the risk urinary stone formation and control the result of anti-relapse treatment in patients with urolithiasis (UL). There are gender differences in the prevalence of UL, which may be related to differences in urine acidity. In this study, the effect of varying degrees of pH urine on metabolic parameters and the frequency of detection of urinary stones of various chemical compositions was studied in men and women with UL.

Materials and methods. We examined 982 patients with ICD (439 men and 543 women aged 18 to 79 years). To assess the lithogenic activity of uricosuria in men and women with UL, the pH values of morning urine were distributed in ascending order and divided into several groups. In each of the ranges, the percentage distribution of types of urinary stones and biochemical parameters of urine and blood were determined.

Results. At urine pH of 5.1-6.5, men have higher calciuria and are more prone to oxalate stone formation, which is 1.5-2.2 times more active in them than in women (p <0.05). In contrast to men, the urinary pH level of women had a greater effect on the frequency of detection of oxalate stones, which decreased by 75.9% with a urine pH of 5.5-5.9 and higher, and was accompanied by a 33.3% decrease in calciuria (p <0.05). Uric acid lithogenesis was more dependent on changes in the pH of urine than on the activity of urocosuria. The frequency of formation of uric acid stones was inversely correlated with the pH of urine in men (r=-0.833, p=0.0102) and women (r=-0.929, p=0.0009). With a decrease in the pH of urine below 6.0, the incidence of uric acid stones in women increased by 5.76 times (p<0.0001), and in men by 1.91 times (p=0.0087). Active phosphate lithogenesis in women did not depend on the level of phosphate excretion, which was 25.5-39.7% lower than in men and progressively decreased with increasing urine pH values (p<0.00029). When the urine pH is higher than 5.9, women have a significantly increased risk of developing calculi from carbonatapatite compared to men (p=0.0005). Struvite lithogenesis increased with urine alkalinization and was more pronounced in women than in men (p=0.043). Comparison of age groups did not reveal any differences in the acidity of morning urine between men and women, however, in contrast to men, a noticeable predominance of the proportion of women with carbonatapatite stones was observed in the groups of patients older than 49 years.

Conclusion. Shifts in the pH of urine can change the nature and direction of lithogenesis in men and women in different ways and are not always associated with the excretion of certain metabolic factors involved in stone formation. Gender features of the lithogenesis of various types of stones in conditions of different acidity of urine should be taken into account when conducting personalized metaphylaxis of urolithiasis.

Attachment Size
Download 2.57 MB
Keywords: urine acidity; urine pH; urolithiasis; metabolic types of urolithiasis; risk of urinary stones formation in men and women