Skip to main content
Number №3, 2025
First analysis of laboratory adherence in the Russian Federation to the sixth edition of the WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen
Number №2, 2025
Post-Void Residual Urine Ratio (PVR-R) as a prognostic marker of chronic kidney disease in men with benign prostate hyperplasia
Number №1, 2025
The effect of testosterone replacement therapy on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men
Number №4, 2024
The structure of damage of the genitourinary system in modern armed conflict
Number №3, 2024
Cost-effectiveness of urinary incontinence treatment in a short-stay hospital
Number №2, 2024
Complex medicines for correction of urine pH level during urolithiasis metaphylaxis
Number №1, 2024
Moscow program on histofusion biopsy of the prostate: results of a survey of practicing urologists based on data from a multicenter study
Number №4, 2023
Possibilities for improving the therapeutic activity of bacteriophage preparations Urological complications after renal transplantation
Number №3, 2023
Regulatory and legal possibilities for metaphylaxis of urolithiasis in the Russian Federation
Number №2, 2023
Frequency and nature of symptoms of dysfunction of the lower urinary tract in persons over 40 years old Postcoital cystitis as a cause of sexual dysfunction in women
Number №4, 2022
Surgical treatment of inferior vena cava tumor thrombus X-ray-free ureterolithotripsy for ureteral stones
Number №3, 2022
Brachytherapy for prostate cancer and immune response Risk factors for nephrolithiasis after radical cystectomy with intestinal plasty of the bladder
Number №2, 2022
The incidence of urolithiasis in the Russian Federation from 2005 to 2020 Urolithiasis and the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke
Number №1, 2022
A modern view on the screening of urolithiasis Hereditary factor of metaphylaxis of urolithiasis Treatment of infertility associated with a high level of sperm DNA fragmentation
Number №4, 2021
COVID-19 associated encrusting cystitis Endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux in children: differentiated choice of method, material and dosage
Number №3, 2021
Artificial intelligence in urology oncology Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy without ureteral catheterization. Comparison with the standard method
Number №1, 2021
Epidemiological study of the prevalence of cystitis in women in the Voronezh region Congenital anomalies of the penis: world and domestic data
Number №5, 2020
Isolated kidney injury: international guidelines and Moscow standards
Number №3, 2020
Epidemiology of neurogenic urinary disorders. Treatment outcomes for high-risk prostate cancer patients: a multicenter analysis
Number №2, 2020
COVID-19: Impact on the Urological Service of the Russian Federation Genitourinary system and Covid-19: some aspects
Number №1, 2020
Distance education in urology. Experience 2012-2019 Inpatient care for urological patients in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic
Number №4, 2019
Male infertility in the Russian Federation: statistics for 2000-2018 Evaluation of the effectiveness of perineum muscle training in restoring erectile function
Number №3, 2019
Epidemiology of urolithiasis in the Perm region: results of a 30-year study The economic and economic rationale for the use of modern methods of treating urolithiasis
Номер №4, 2018
Incidence of ICD in the Russian Federation (2005-2016) Screening for prostate cancer: modern presentation and organization Primary multiple transitional cell epithelium Androgenic screening in men over 50 years
Номер №3, 2018
The role of stem cells in the treatment of urinary incontinence Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in infected urine Testicular Prosthesis in Children and Adolescents: Results from a Multicenter Study Premature ejaculation is the current state of the problem.
Number №2, 2018
Alternative methods of treatment of localized prostate cancer Partial doubling of the urethra: paraurethral motion Comparative review of disposable flexible ureteronephroscope
Number №1, 2018
The prevalence of symptoms of impairment of the function of the lower urinary tract in men according to the results of a population study Patient-centered system of organization of medical care in urology using...
Number №4, 2017
Predicting the development of erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular diseases Prognostic factors of survival of patients with prostate cancer
Number №3, 2017
Recommendations for the treatment of prostate cancer with the help of high-power interstitial radiation therapy (brachytherapy)
Number №2, 2017

Radioisotope lymphoscintigraphy with PCa
Metabolic risk factors and formation of urinary stones
Ureteral amputation in the performance of contact ureterolithotrypsy

Number №1, 2017
Principles of «4P Medicine» in the organization of health care in the context of urological diseases Changes in the electrolyte composition of urine under the influence of sodium hypochlorite. The possibility of reducing the risk of recurrence of nephrolithiasis
Number №4, 2016
Preliminary results of a multicenter study of prostate cancer Analysis of specialized medical care for patients with gross hematuria, renal colic.
Number №3, 2016
Techniques for preserving continence after robot-prostatectomy The protective partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma
Number №2, 2016
Медицинская помощь пациентам с острой задержкой мочеиспускания Прогностическое значение истинного кастрационного уровня тестостерона..
Number №1, 2016
The analysis of the accuracy of factors for the survival predictiry after radical cystectomy Citokine status in pathients with recurrent urinary tract infection
Number №4, 2015

Modern demographic situation in Russia Determination of gene mutations FGFR3 and PIK3CA DNA urine sediment from patients with bladder cancerя

Number №3, 2015
Neuroendocrine differentiation in cancer prostate. The role of viruses in carcinogenesis of bladder cancer.
Number №2, 2015
Clinical and economic evaluation of prostate cancer screening The combination RSAZ TMPRSS2-ERG in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: first experience
Number №1, 2015
The role of distance education in improving primary health care professionals. Comparative analysis of the results of cancer radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy.
Number №4, 2014
Experience of clinical and economical treatment cancer patients Comparison of analysis details for open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted nephrectomy in the..
Number №3, 2014
Medical and economic aspects of a comprehensive standardized program-stage diagnosis and treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
Number №2, 2014
Uronephrological morbidity and mortality in Russia in 2002-2012 Androgens and chronic ischemia PCA3 test-system: first results
Number №1, 2014
First results of standardized programme for BPH diagnosis and treatment Evaluation of serum Chromogranin A levels in different prostatic diseases Retarded ejaculation is a rare diagnosis
Number №4, 2013
Distance education in urology brachytherapy prostate cancer Erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular ...
Number №3, 2013
The incidence of kidney stones... HIFU-treatment of local recurrence of cancer... Non-prostatic sources of prostate...
Number №2, 2013
Risk factors for the development
of the urolithiasis in patients
with the metabolic syndrome
Number №1, 2013
Clinical and economic analysis of the surgical treatment of prostate cancer Brachytherapy prostate cancer: postimplantnaya dosimetry and dependence ... Simulation prostatic carcinogenesis
Number №4, 2012
Урологическая заболеваемость в Нижегородской области Стресс, метаболический синдром и хроническая болезнь почек TVT - 10 лет в России
Eksperimental'naya i klinicheskaya urologiya

Metabolic risk factors and urinary stones formation. IK: Lithogenic features of monomineral and mixed stones in men and women

Number №2, 2024 - page 68-80
DOI: 10.29188/2222-8543-2024-17-2-68-80
For citation: Golovanov S.A., Prosyannikov M.Yu., Sivkov A.V., Anokhin N.V., Voуtko D.A., Drozhzheva V.V. Metabolic risk factors and urinary stones formation. IX: Lithogenic features of monomineral and mixed stones in men and women. Experimental and Clinical Urology 2024;17(2):68-80; https://doi.org/10.29188/2222-8543-2024-17-2-68-80
Golovanov S.A. Prosyannikov M.Yu. Sivkov A.V. Anohin N.V. Voytko D.A. Drozhzheva V.V.
Information about authors:
  • Golovanov S.A. – Dr. Sci., head of clinical laboratory diagnostic group of scientific laboratory department, N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – Branch of the National Medical Research Centre of Radiology of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation; Moscow, Russia; RSCI Author ID 636685, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6516-4730
  • Prosyannikov M.Yu. – Dr. Sci., head of the department of N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Centre of Radiology of Ministry of health of Russian Federation; Moscow, Russia; RSCI Author ID 791050, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3635-5244
  • Sivkov A.V. – PhD, Deputy Director of N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – Branch of the National Medical Research Centre of Radiology of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation; Moscow, Russia; RSCI Author ID 622663, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8852-6485
  • Anokhin N.V. – PhD, Senior Researcher at the Department of urolithiasis of N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre; Moscow, Russia; RSCI Author ID 8807749, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4341-4276
  • Voytko D.A. – PhD, Senior Researcher of N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Centre of Radiology of Ministry of health of Russian Federation; Moscow, Russia; RSCI Author ID 942353, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1292-1651
  • Drozhzheva V.V. – researcher of scientific Laboratory Department of N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – Branch of the National Medical Research Centre of Radiology of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation; Moscow, Russia; RSCI Author ID 696724
4285
Download PDF

Introduction. The study of lithogenic substances excretion in stone formers with pure monomineral stones allows us to identify characteristic metabolic changes, the long-term effect of which determines the originality of the pathogenetic mechanism features of the formation of urinary stones consisting of pure minerals. The problem of studying lithogenesis of «pure» (monomineral) stones in stone formers is of great clinical importance, since it assumes the existence of various approaches to prevention and metaphylaxis of urolithiasis in patients with «pure» stones and mixed stones.

Materials and methods. We examined 982 patients with urolithiasis (439 men and 543 women aged from 18 to 79 years. Of these, 837 patients (384 men and 453 women) had «pure» urinary stones of various types, represented by one mineral. Metabolic parameters of excretion in patients were studied men and women with monomineral urinary stones of various chemical types.

Results. In oxalate stones, the most active accumulation of the calcium oxalate mineral component and an increase in the number of «pure» oxalate stones by 1.25 times was observed in men than in women (p=0.046). Increased calcium excretion activates oxalate lithogenesis in men, as opposed to women, contributing to the accumulation of veddelite in pure oxalate stones. In contrast to women, the accumulation of calcium oxalate in stones in men is associated with increased excretion of uric acid, phosphates, and partly magnesium (p<0.01). In uric acid stones consisting of pure uric acid and uric acid dihydrate, pure uric acid stones were 1.52 times more common in women than in men (p<0.01), and did not depend on the level of uricosuria. Patients with pure uric acid stones had lower urine pH than patients with pure calcium-oxalate stones. The accumulation of uric acid in stones to the level of pure uric acid stones was accompanied in the groups of men by an increase in phosphaturia (p=0.021), and in the groups of women – with an increase in body mass index (p=0.028). Men with 100% uric acid stones had higher levels of excretion of calcium, uric acid and phosphates compared to female patients by 1.21 times, 1.3 times and 1.26 times, respectively (p<0.05). Urinary stones from pure carbonate apatite were rare in men and women. In women, stones of mixed composition with 80-90% carbonatapatite were more often detected, and in men with 60-70% of this mineral. In men, compared with women, with the accumulation of carbonatapatite in stones, an increase in the excretion of calcium, uric acid, phosphates and magnesium was observed (p<0.05). About 80% of mixed stones in stone formers men and women are pure calcium oxalate-phosphate bimineral stones consisting only of carbonate apatite and calcium oxalate. In men, in contrast to women, there was a predominance of calcium oxalate (1.24 times), the accumulation of which in these stones was higher. It is associated with increased excretion of calcium, uric acid, phosphates, and magnesium (1.41-fold, 1.32-fold, 1.35-fold, and 1.33-fold, respectively (p<0.05). Men with calcium oxalate-phosphate stones had higher calcium excretion than those with pure calcium oxalate or carbonate apatite stones and lower urine pH values than those with carbonate apatite stones (p<0.01). In women, level of calciuria did not play a big role in the genesis of pure calcium oxalate-phosphate, calcium oxalate and carbonate apatite stones. A more important factor in their lithogenesis was the alkaline reaction of urine, which led to the activation of carbonate apatite stone formation.

Conclusion. The formation of urinary stone and the distribution of its mineral components depend on the interaction of various metabolic factors. The study of groups of patients with pure (100%) monomineral stones and patients with stones of mixed composition, in which main mineral is only the predominant part, allows us to identify characteristic complexes of lithogenic metabolic factors that distinguish these groups of patients from each other. This approach is important both for understanding the pathogenetic mechanisms of stone formation, and for choosing the directions of empirical therapy for urolithiasis and developing further metaphylactic measures that also take into account the gender of patients.

Attachment Size
Download 1.99 MB
Keywords: urolithiasis; lithogenesis of monomineral stones; metabolic types of urolithiasis; risk of urolithiasis formation in men and women