Skip to main content
Number №3, 2025
First analysis of laboratory adherence in the Russian Federation to the sixth edition of the WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen
Number №2, 2025
Post-Void Residual Urine Ratio (PVR-R) as a prognostic marker of chronic kidney disease in men with benign prostate hyperplasia
Number №1, 2025
The effect of testosterone replacement therapy on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men
Number №4, 2024
The structure of damage of the genitourinary system in modern armed conflict
Number №3, 2024
Cost-effectiveness of urinary incontinence treatment in a short-stay hospital
Number №2, 2024
Complex medicines for correction of urine pH level during urolithiasis metaphylaxis
Number №1, 2024
Moscow program on histofusion biopsy of the prostate: results of a survey of practicing urologists based on data from a multicenter study
Number №4, 2023
Possibilities for improving the therapeutic activity of bacteriophage preparations Urological complications after renal transplantation
Number №3, 2023
Regulatory and legal possibilities for metaphylaxis of urolithiasis in the Russian Federation
Number №2, 2023
Frequency and nature of symptoms of dysfunction of the lower urinary tract in persons over 40 years old Postcoital cystitis as a cause of sexual dysfunction in women
Number №4, 2022
Surgical treatment of inferior vena cava tumor thrombus X-ray-free ureterolithotripsy for ureteral stones
Number №3, 2022
Brachytherapy for prostate cancer and immune response Risk factors for nephrolithiasis after radical cystectomy with intestinal plasty of the bladder
Number №2, 2022
The incidence of urolithiasis in the Russian Federation from 2005 to 2020 Urolithiasis and the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke
Number №1, 2022
A modern view on the screening of urolithiasis Hereditary factor of metaphylaxis of urolithiasis Treatment of infertility associated with a high level of sperm DNA fragmentation
Number №4, 2021
COVID-19 associated encrusting cystitis Endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux in children: differentiated choice of method, material and dosage
Number №3, 2021
Artificial intelligence in urology oncology Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy without ureteral catheterization. Comparison with the standard method
Number №1, 2021
Epidemiological study of the prevalence of cystitis in women in the Voronezh region Congenital anomalies of the penis: world and domestic data
Number №5, 2020
Isolated kidney injury: international guidelines and Moscow standards
Number №3, 2020
Epidemiology of neurogenic urinary disorders. Treatment outcomes for high-risk prostate cancer patients: a multicenter analysis
Number №2, 2020
COVID-19: Impact on the Urological Service of the Russian Federation Genitourinary system and Covid-19: some aspects
Number №1, 2020
Distance education in urology. Experience 2012-2019 Inpatient care for urological patients in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic
Number №4, 2019
Male infertility in the Russian Federation: statistics for 2000-2018 Evaluation of the effectiveness of perineum muscle training in restoring erectile function
Number №3, 2019
Epidemiology of urolithiasis in the Perm region: results of a 30-year study The economic and economic rationale for the use of modern methods of treating urolithiasis
Номер №4, 2018
Incidence of ICD in the Russian Federation (2005-2016) Screening for prostate cancer: modern presentation and organization Primary multiple transitional cell epithelium Androgenic screening in men over 50 years
Номер №3, 2018
The role of stem cells in the treatment of urinary incontinence Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in infected urine Testicular Prosthesis in Children and Adolescents: Results from a Multicenter Study Premature ejaculation is the current state of the problem.
Number №2, 2018
Alternative methods of treatment of localized prostate cancer Partial doubling of the urethra: paraurethral motion Comparative review of disposable flexible ureteronephroscope
Number №1, 2018
The prevalence of symptoms of impairment of the function of the lower urinary tract in men according to the results of a population study Patient-centered system of organization of medical care in urology using...
Number №4, 2017
Predicting the development of erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular diseases Prognostic factors of survival of patients with prostate cancer
Number №3, 2017
Recommendations for the treatment of prostate cancer with the help of high-power interstitial radiation therapy (brachytherapy)
Number №2, 2017

Radioisotope lymphoscintigraphy with PCa
Metabolic risk factors and formation of urinary stones
Ureteral amputation in the performance of contact ureterolithotrypsy

Number №1, 2017
Principles of «4P Medicine» in the organization of health care in the context of urological diseases Changes in the electrolyte composition of urine under the influence of sodium hypochlorite. The possibility of reducing the risk of recurrence of nephrolithiasis
Number №4, 2016
Preliminary results of a multicenter study of prostate cancer Analysis of specialized medical care for patients with gross hematuria, renal colic.
Number №3, 2016
Techniques for preserving continence after robot-prostatectomy The protective partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma
Number №2, 2016
Медицинская помощь пациентам с острой задержкой мочеиспускания Прогностическое значение истинного кастрационного уровня тестостерона..
Number №1, 2016
The analysis of the accuracy of factors for the survival predictiry after radical cystectomy Citokine status in pathients with recurrent urinary tract infection
Number №4, 2015

Modern demographic situation in Russia Determination of gene mutations FGFR3 and PIK3CA DNA urine sediment from patients with bladder cancerя

Number №3, 2015
Neuroendocrine differentiation in cancer prostate. The role of viruses in carcinogenesis of bladder cancer.
Number №2, 2015
Clinical and economic evaluation of prostate cancer screening The combination RSAZ TMPRSS2-ERG in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: first experience
Number №1, 2015
The role of distance education in improving primary health care professionals. Comparative analysis of the results of cancer radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy.
Number №4, 2014
Experience of clinical and economical treatment cancer patients Comparison of analysis details for open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted nephrectomy in the..
Number №3, 2014
Medical and economic aspects of a comprehensive standardized program-stage diagnosis and treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
Number №2, 2014
Uronephrological morbidity and mortality in Russia in 2002-2012 Androgens and chronic ischemia PCA3 test-system: first results
Number №1, 2014
First results of standardized programme for BPH diagnosis and treatment Evaluation of serum Chromogranin A levels in different prostatic diseases Retarded ejaculation is a rare diagnosis
Number №4, 2013
Distance education in urology brachytherapy prostate cancer Erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular ...
Number №3, 2013
The incidence of kidney stones... HIFU-treatment of local recurrence of cancer... Non-prostatic sources of prostate...
Number №2, 2013
Risk factors for the development
of the urolithiasis in patients
with the metabolic syndrome
Number №1, 2013
Clinical and economic analysis of the surgical treatment of prostate cancer Brachytherapy prostate cancer: postimplantnaya dosimetry and dependence ... Simulation prostatic carcinogenesis
Number №4, 2012
Урологическая заболеваемость в Нижегородской области Стресс, метаболический синдром и хроническая болезнь почек TVT - 10 лет в России
Eksperimental'naya i klinicheskaya urologiya

Modern generations of urological drainage systems. Achievements and prospects

Number №2, 2024 - page 138-146
DOI: 10.29188/2222-8543-2024-17-2-138-146
For citation: Polyakov N.V., Trushkin R.N., Medvedev P.E., Serebryany S.A., Apolikhin O.I., Kaprin A.D. Modern generations of urological drainage systems. Achievements and prospects. Experimental and Clinical Urology 2024;17(2):138-146; https://doi.org/10.29188/2222-8543-2024-17-2-138-146
Polyakov N.V. Trushkin R.N. Medvedev P.E. Serebryanyy S.A. Apolihin O.I. Kaprin A.D.
Information about authors:
  • Polyakov N.V. – PhD, Head of the Reconstructive Urology Group of the Department of General and Reconstructive Urοlοgy of N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology - branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation; Moscow, Russia; RSCI Author ID 412267
  • Trushkin R.N. – Dr. Sci., professor of the Department of Urology and Operative Nephrology with a course of oncourology at RUDN University, Head of the Department of Urology of the City Clinical Hospital No. 52 of the Moscow Department of Health; Moscow, Russia; RSCI Author ID 454825, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3108-0539
  • Medvedev P.E. – urologist of the urological department of the City Clinical Hospital No. 52 of the Moscow Department of Health; Moscow, Russia; RSCI Author ID 1231360, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4250-0815
  • Serebryany S.A. – PhD, Senior Researcher of the Endourology Group of the Department of General and Reconstructive Urology of N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation; Moscow, Russia; RSCI AuthorID 695351
  • Apolikhin O.I. – Dr. Sci., professor, сor.-member of RAS, director of N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Centre of Radiology of Ministry of health of Russian Federation; Moscow, Russia; RSCI Author ID 683661, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0206-043X
  • Kaprin A.D. – Dr. Sci., professor, academician of RAS, general director of the National Medical Research Centre of Radiology of Ministry of health of Russian Federation, director of P.A. Herzen Institution, Head of Department of Oncology and Radiology named after V.P. Kharchenko of RUDN University; Moscow, Russia; RSCI Author ID 96775, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8784-8415
3266
Download PDF

Introduction. Currently, stents are used in the treatment of various benign and malignant diseases of the upper urinary tract and urethra. Modern stents made of a superelastic alloy, coated with a polymer, regardless of location, are characterized by higher and longer-lasting patency in terms of decompression and relief of obstruction, fewer irritative symptoms of the genitourinary system and no need for frequent replacement, which leads to improved quality of life in addition to cost savings. Despite promising results, there are few studies in the literature regarding their use, and these tend to be peer-to-peer, retrospective, involving small numbers of patients, and based on the surgeon's personal experience.

Materials and methods. In literature review used data about using minimally invasive methods for treatment of ureteral strictures, published in PubMed’s base (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/), scientific electronic library of RF – Elibrary.ru (https://elibrary.ru/) and also professional endourological association websites. The databases were searched using the following keywords: «ureteral stent», «urethral stent», «allium», «uventa» and «memokath». At the first stage, 93 sources no older than 5 years were found that were relevant to the topic of the review. Conference abstracts, short communications, and duplicate publications were excluded. Then, based on the relevance of the data, the reliability of the sources, the impact factors of the journals and the sequence of presentation of the material in the manuscript, 43 articles in scientific international peer-reviewed journals, practical guidelines and clinical recommendations were selected directly for citation in the review.

Results. The stent is one of the most common urological prostheses used in the treatment of obstructive uropathy. The main causes of obstruction of the ureter and urethra include benign and malignant factors. Active introduction of minimally invasive technologies into everyday urological practice using ureteral or urethral stents are effective and safe methods of urine diversion (especially in comorbid patients), however, unfortunately, side effects from the use of these prosthetic systems continue to reduce the quality of life of patients.

The use of polymer materials in urology has made it possible to introduce a huge number of non-metallic stents used by urologists, however, due to the occurrence of various kinds of complications, an attempt has been made to introduce a new generation of stents – made of a superelastic alloy, coated with polymer.

Stents made of superelastic alloy coated with polymer have been used in the treatment of various pathologies of the ureter and urethra for more than two decades. The need for reliable long-term urinary tract drainage has led to the development of improved urinary tract stent designs such as Memokath, Allium, and Uventa. The main advantages of the latter are a convenient delivery system, a self-expanding mechanism, low adhesive properties, no tissue ingrowth, ease of removal, and no need for frequent replacement. Despite the evolution of ureteral and urethral stent designs, complications continue to arise that limit their use and the search for «ideal» drainage systems continues.

Conclusion. Today it is difficult to overestimate the role of drainage systems in the treatment of obstructive urological and oncological diseases. However, despite significant success in their use, prostheses are constantly subject to constant modifications and developments aimed at increasing their suitability, durability, ease of implantation and functionality, while reducing the complications associated with them. Future developments in the field of urogenital prosthetic surgery and urology in general continue to attract interest, and ongoing research into new biomaterials, stem cells and tissue engineering is expanding the boundaries of possible interventions in the human genitourinary tract.

Attachment Size
Download 563.17 KB
Keywords: ureteral stents; urethral stents; Uventa; Memokath; Allium