Number №3, 2020 - page 118-123

Buccal urethroplasty: 2020 literature review update DOI: 10.29188/2222-8543-2020-12-3-118-123

For citation: Katibov M.I., Bogdanov A.B.,Dovlatov Z.A. Buccal urethroplasty: 2020 literature review update. Experimental and clinical urology 2020;(3):118-123. https://doi.org/10.29188/2222-8543-2020-12-3-118-123
Katibov M.I., Bogdanov A.B., Dovlatov Z.A.
Information about authors:
  • Katibov M.I. – DrSc, Associate Professor, Chief of Urological department of State budgetary institution of the Republic of Dagestan «City Clinical Hospital, Professor of Department of Urology of Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Dagestan State Medical University» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6273-7660
  • Bogdanov A.B. – MD, PhD, Urologist of Urological department of S.P. Botkin City Clinical Hospital, Associate Professor of Department of Urology and Surgical Andrology of Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Further Professional Education «Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, https://orcid.org/ 0000-0001-5347-8364
  • Dovlatov Z.A.ogly – DrSc, Assistant of Department of Urology and Surgical Andrology of Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Further Professional Education «Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1948-7317
28

Introduction. We have analyzed the world experience of using buccal graft as a relatively safe and effective method of surgical treatment of extensive ureteral strictures.

Materials and methods. The review was conducted on the basis of data published in the PubMed databases, the Elibrary.ru Scientific Electronic Library and on the websites of professional urological associations. At the first stage, 107 sources were found, of which 35 articles were included in the review.

Results. We identified 21 original studies with buccal graft for ureteroplasty, among them open surgery was applied in 13 studies, robotic in 6 studies and laparoscopic in 2 studies. A total of buccal ureteroplasty using all three approaches was performed 96 times for 94 patients (such an operation was performed on both ureters for two patients). The open operation was applied in 55 cases in 53 patients with an average ureteral stricture length of 5.8 cm (2.5-15.0 cm). After open surgery, recovery of normal ureteral patency was recorded in 94.5% (52/55) of cases for an average follow-up period of 28 months (3-85 months). Robotic technique was used in 39 patients with an average ureteral stricture length of 3.8 cm (1.5-8.0 cm). The success of treatment after robotic operations was achieved in 89.7% (35/39) cases for an average follow-up period of 20 months (3.5-44 months). Laparoscopic technique was used only in two patients, and postoperative follow-up was 1 and 9 months, respectively. No stricture recurrence was noted during this period. All variants of operations were associated with a minimal risk of early and late postoperative complications.

Conclusions. Buccal ureteroplasty can be regarded as an advantageous alternative to severe and associated with a high incidence of complications surgery (replacement intestinal ureter, autotransplantation of the kidney, etc.), used for long ureteral stricture.

AttachmentSize
Download185.81 KB
ureteral stricture; ureteroplasty; buccal graft.

Readera - Социальная платформа публикаций

Crossref makes research outputs easy to find, cite, link, and assess