English
Russian
Instrumental methods for assessing the functional ability of the kidneys DOI: 10.29188/2222-8543-2023-16-2-76-85
- Prosyannikov M.Yu. – Dr. Sci., head of the department of N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Centre of Radiology of Ministry of health of Russian Federation; Moscow, Russia; RSCI Author ID 791050; https://orcid.org/0000‑0003‑3635‑5244
- Kazachenko A.V. – Dr. Sci., Deputy Director for Medical Work of N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – Branch of the National Medical Research Centre of Radiology of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, professor of the Department of Urology and Operative Nephrology with a course of oncourology, RUDN University; Moscow, Russia; RSCI AuthorID 334714; https://orcid.org/0000‑0003‑3198‑5933
- Voytko D.A. – PhD, Senior Researcher of N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Centre of Radiology of Ministry of health of Russian Federation; Moscow, Russia; RSCI AuthorID 942353; https://orcid.org/0000‑0003‑1292‑1651
- Konstantinova O.V. – Dr. Sci., Chief Researcher at the Department of urolithiasis of N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – Branch of the National Medical Research Centre of Radiology of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation; Moscow, Russia; RSCI AuthorID 67996; https://orcid.org/0000‑0002‑2214‑7543
- Anokhin N.V. – PhD, Senior Researcher at the Department of urolithiasis of N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre; Moscow, Russia; RSCI AuthorID 8807749; https://orcid.org/0000‑0002‑4341‑4276
- Gromov A.I. – Dr. Sci., Professor, Head of the Group of Radiation Methods of Diagnosis and Treatment of the Department of Oncourology of N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre; Moscow, Russia; RSCI AuthorID 304475
- Sivkov A.V. – PhD, Deputy Director of N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Centre of Radiology of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; Moscow, Russia; RSCI Author ID 622663; https://orcid.org/0000‑0001‑8852‑6485
- Apolikhin O.I. – Dr. Sci., professor, сor.-member of RAS, director of N. Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Centre of Radiology of Ministry of health of Russian Federation; Moscow, Russia; RSCI Author ID 683661; https://orcid.org/0000‑0003‑0206‑043X
- Kaprin A.D. – Dr. Sci., professor, academician of RAS, general director of the National Medical Research Centre of Radiology of Ministry of health of Russian Federation, director of MORI n.a. P.A. Hertzen – branch of the National Medical Research Centre of Radiology of Ministry of health of Russian Federation; Obninsk, Russia; Head of Department of Oncology and Radiology n.a. V.P. Kharchenko of RUDN University; Moscow, Russia; RSCI AuthorID 96775; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8784-8415
339 Introduction. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global medical problem. The long-term latent course of the disease leads to a progressive increase in its incidence. Along with laboratory methods of research in the arsenal of the diagnostic service, there are tools that allow you to detect a violation of the kidneys functional ability.
Purpose. To analyze modern instrumental methods for diagnosing the functional ability of the kidneys.
Materials and methods. The review was conducted based on data published in PubMed databases (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed /) and еLibrary.ru (https://elibrary.ru) and was limited only to articles in scientific peer-reviewed journals. It was carried out until January 2023, by keywords: kidney ultrasound, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, kidney function.
Results. We found 189 sources not older than 10 years (published after 2012) that were relevant to the topic of the review. Conference abstracts, short messages, duplicate publications were excluded from them. After that, based on the relevance of the data, reliability of sources, impact factors of journals and the sequence of presentation of the material in the manuscript, 46 articles were selected directly for citation in the review. Also, when writing the review, original articles published before 2012 were used.
Conclusion. The available modern instrumental methods for assessing renal function open up broad prospects for their clinical application and require further research.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| Download | 1.15 MB |
